1/23/2018 0 Comments Gambit Full Movie![]() Directed by Gore Verbinski. With Lizzy Caplan, Channing Tatum. Plot is unknown. Jedis, Bellas, and Jaegers await you in our Winter Movie Guide. Plan your season and take note of the hotly anticipated indie, foreign, and documentary releases, too. Gambit definition, Chess. An opening in which a player seeks to obtain some advantage by sacrificing a pawn or piece. Oct 12, 2017. Gambit always was known for being a romantic, so it's only appropriate that his movie is opening on Valentine's Day. 20th Century Fox has set a Feb. 14, 2019 release date for Gambit, the X-Men spinoff starring Channing Tatum. Fox's Deadpool opened to big numbers over Valentine's Day weekend in. Queen's Gambit. The gambit is introduced by 2.c4. If Black takes the pawn (dxc4), White can move e2–e4 and take control of the center, while threatening to capture the black pawn with the bishop (Bxc4). A gambit (from ancient gambetto, meaning 'to trip') is a in which a player, more often,, usually a, with the hope of achieving a resulting advantageous position. Some well-known examples are the (1.e4 e5 2.f4), (1.d4 d5 2.c4), and (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4). A gambit used by Black may also be called a gambit (e.g. The —1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 or —1.d4 e5), but is sometimes called a 'countergambit' (e.g. The —1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 and, an old-fashioned name for the Latvian Gambit). The word 'gambit' was originally applied to chess openings in 1561 by priest, from an Italian expression dare il gambetto (to put a leg forward in order to trip someone). Lopez studied this maneuver, and so the Italian word gained the Spanish form gambito that led to French gambit, which has influenced the English spelling of the word. The broader sense of 'opening move meant to gain advantage' was first recorded in English in 1855. Queen's Gambit Declined Gambits are often said to be 'offered' to an opponent, and that offer is then said to be either 'accepted' or 'declined.' If a player who is offered a gambit captures the piece (and thus gains material) the gambit is said to be accepted. If the player who was offered the gambit ignores it and instead continues his or her development, then the gambit is said to be declined. In modern chess, the typical response to a moderately sound gambit is to accept the material and give the material back at an advantageous time. For gambits that are less sound, the accepting player is more likely to try to hold on to his extra material. A rule of thumb often found in various primers on chess suggests that a player should get three moves (see ) of for a sacrificed pawn, but it is unclear how useful this general maxim is since the 'free moves' part of the is almost never the entirety of what the gambiteer gains. Of course, a player is not obliged to accept a gambit. Often, a gambit can be declined without disadvantage. Soundness [ ] A gambit is said to be 'sound' if it is capable of procuring adequate concessions from the opponent. There are three general criteria in which a gambit is often said to be sound: • Time gain: the player accepting the gambit must take time to procure the sacrificed material and possibly must use more time to reorganize his pieces after the material is taken. • Generation of differential activity: Often a player accepting a gambit will decentralize his pieces or pawns and his poorly placed pieces will allow the gambiteer to place his own pieces and pawns on squares that might otherwise have been inaccessible. In addition, bishops and rooks can become more active simply because the loss of pawns often gives rise to open and. Former world champion, one of the most extraordinary attacking players of the 20th century, once reportedly told that he had sacrificed a pawn because it was simply in his way. • Generation of positional weaknesses: Finally, accepting a gambit may lead to a compromised, holes or other positional deficiencies. A good example of a sound gambit is the: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4. Here Black can force White to sacrifice a pawn speculatively with 4.Bb4+, but White gets very good compensation for one pawn after 5.c3 dxc3 6.bxc3, or for two pawns after 6.0-0 inviting 6.cxb2 7.Bxb2, due to the development advantage and attacking chances against the black king. As a result, Black is often advised not to try to hold on to the extra pawn. A more dubious gambit is the so-called: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nxe5?! Here the investment (a knight for just one pawn) is too large for the moderate advantage of having a strong center. Examples [ ]. Main article: •: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 •: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 f5 •: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 intending 2..cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 with 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 likely to follow. • (BDG): 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 followed by 4.f3 •: 1.f4 e5 •: 1.d4 f5 2.e4 •: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4?! This is not a true gambit by Black, since after 4.Nxe5!? Black wins material. White can (and from this position should) play a gambit himself with 5.Bxf7+! Qxe5 7.Bxg8 Rxg8 8.c3 Nc6 9.d4, when White's two pawns and rolling pawn center, combined with Black's misplaced king, give White strong compensation for the sacrificed bishop. •: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5!? Nxf7 Kxf7 •: 1. D5 b5 •: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Qb6 6.Bd3 cxd4 7.cxd4 Bd7 8.Nc3 Nxd4 9.Nxd4 Qxd4 Notes [ ].
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |